The Journal of the American Dental Association
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

J Am Dent Assoc, Vol 100, No 5, 696-699.
© 1980 American Dental Association
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Shillingburg, H.
Right arrow Articles by Hemphill, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Shillingburg, H., Jr
Right arrow Articles by Hemphill, M.
Journal of the American Dental Association, Vol 100, Issue 5, 696-699
Copyright © 1980 by American Dental Association

Journal Article

Impression materials and techniques used for cast restorations in eight states



HT Shillingburg Jr, RA Hatch, MP Keenan, and MW Hemphill

In a survey of dentists practicing in eight states, it was found that polysulfide is used by 35.8% of them for cast restorations. Polyether and hydrocolloid are the second most used materials; silicone putty/reline and double mix standard silicone follow. Epinephrine cord was chosen for gingival retraction by 73.3% of the respondents. Nonepinephrine cord is used by 23.5% of the dentists who responded.




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright©1995-1980 American Dental Association (ADA).
Reproduction or republication strictly prohibited without prior written permission of ADA.