The Journal of the American Dental Association
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Am Dent Assoc, Vol 103, No 6, 894-895.
© 1981 American Dental Association

This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bell, R.
Right arrow Articles by Richardson, A
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bell, R.
Right arrow Articles by Richardson, A
Journal of the American Dental Association, Vol 103, Issue 6, 894-895
Copyright © 1981 by American Dental Association


Case Reports

Prosthodontic treatment of pendulous maxillary tuberosities



RA Bell and A Richardson

Reduction of the maxillary tuberosities is not always possible when indicated, and it is sometimes necessary to solve the problem by modifying the construction procedures for the complete denture. Because of inadequate space between the maxillary tuberosity and the retromolar pad, acrylic bases of adequate thickness could not be used. Instead, gold shims 1-min thick were cast over the tuberosities. They had loops around the periphery and V-shaped recesses to allow for even finishing of the wax-up of the record base to the gold shims. Jaw relation records were made and the teeth were set in bilateral crossbite because of the discrepancy in arch size. The acrylic resin was then processed, the dentures finished and polished, and normal laboratory and clinical remount procedures observed. Because there was some space available, this technique worked well. Both tuberosities and retromolar pad areas may also be cast in gold to allow for even thinner base in this area; however, when surgical reduction is possible, it is still the preferable treatment.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright©1995-1981 American Dental Association (ADA).
Reproduction or republication strictly prohibited without prior written permission of ADA.