The Journal of the American Dental Association
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Am Dent Assoc, Vol 106, No 1, 53-56.
© 1983 American Dental Association

This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, W.
Right arrow Articles by DeStigter, T
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, W.
Right arrow Articles by DeStigter, T
Journal of the American Dental Association, Vol 106, Issue 1, 53-56
Copyright © 1983 by American Dental Association


Case Reports

Hypersensitivity to procaine, tetracaine, mepivacaine, and methylparaben: report of a case



WT Johnson and T DeStigter

The patient who comes for dental treatment with a history of hypersensitivity to local anesthetics is often denied the benefits of adequate pain control during dental therapy. Ninety percent of the patients challenged by Incaudo and associates were being evaluated because they needed local anesthesia for dental treatment. These same patients may some day need local anesthetic agents for minor surgery or for the treatment of cardiac arrhythmias. For those cases in which an allergic reaction is suspected, consultation with an allergist may prove beneficial to the patient by providing information and a local anesthetic that the patient can receive safely for both medical and dental needs.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright©1995-1983 American Dental Association (ADA).
Reproduction or republication strictly prohibited without prior written permission of ADA.