The Journal of the American Dental Association
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Am Dent Assoc, Vol 107, No 3, 466-469.
© 1983 American Dental Association

This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Journal of the American Dental Association, Vol 107, Issue 3, 466-469
Copyright © 1983 by American Dental Association


Journal Article

Methods of calculating UCR benefits. Council on Dental Care Programs




A total of 15 insurance firms and service plans responded with completed or partially completed questionnaires to a survey conducted by the Council in response to a directive of the 1981 House of Delegates. The survey to determine the various methods used in the calculation of UCR benefits asked that the firms and service plans provide the source of their fee data; the locality used in establishing customary fees; the frequency with which their maximum allowable benefits are updated; the age of the data used in the updates; the percentile used as the upper limit on the range of fees; the method of determining the percentile; and their definitions of "unusual fee," "customary fee," "reasonable fee," and "prevailing fee." In addition, the surveyed firms and plans were asked to supply their maximum allowable benefits for eight dental procedures provided in a given city on a given date. Most respondents advised that they use the 90th percentile as the upper limit on allowable fees. Most commonly, postal zip code (first three digits) or counties updated quarterly using fees from the previous six months are used for locality and fee updating. Among insurance firms, claim statistics normally are used to develop the fee base, but among service plans, prefiled fees predominate. Although most examples indicated that similar statistical calculations were used in determining the upper limit on benefits, some notable variations were reported, including a composite weighting of all fees filed by a dentist and individual dentist profiles for usual fees, which are used to calculate customary fees. Insufficient responses were received on maximum allowable benefits to permit statistically valid analysis. The Council recognizes that a free market encourages variety among competitors. To make sure that plan participants are not misled about the benefits provided, the Council urges that specific information concerning the method of calculating benefits be provided to plan participants and in the case of service plans, to participating dentists.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright©1995-1983 American Dental Association (ADA).
Reproduction or republication strictly prohibited without prior written permission of ADA.