The Journal of the American Dental Association
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Am Dent Assoc, Vol 111, No 3, 479-483.
© 1985 American Dental Association

This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Journal of the American Dental Association, Vol 111, Issue 3, 479-483
Copyright © 1985 by American Dental Association


Journal Article

Report on base metal alloys for crown and bridge applications: benefits and risks. Council on Dental Materials, Instruments, and Equipment




Despite the widespread use of nickel-based alloys, claims for the safety of these alloys have not yet been accepted universally. The allergenic effects of nickel on dental patients and the potential toxic effects of nickel and beryllium on laboratory technicians continue to cause concern within the dental profession. The systemic response to metallic nickel and nickel compounds as a result of intraoral corrosion and dissolution of nickel-based restorations over extended periods have not been studied adequately. The dental profession may be overgeneralizing the relative safety of nickel alloys because of the lack of allergy-induced intraoral lesions observed in private practices. Additional animal studies are needed to characterize the acute and chronic toxicities of nickel compounds. The potential for dermatologic and systemic effects that may occur in patients and dental personnel because of exposure to cobalt alloys must not be overlooked. Although sensitivity reactions may be of some concern, the toxicity potential of cobalt-chromium alloys appears to be insignificant. Little research has been done to determine the carcinogenic potential of nickel in dental laboratory technicians. In addition, animal and human studies are needed to determine the effect of nickel and beryllium exposure on the reproductive system. In the interim, specific equipment and facilities that minimize dust and vapor exposure to dental technicians should be identified to reduce airborne concentrations of nickel and beryllium in commercial dental laboratories to levels well below those established by the Occupational Health and Safety Administration.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright©1995-1985 American Dental Association (ADA).
Reproduction or republication strictly prohibited without prior written permission of ADA.