The Journal of the American Dental Association
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Am Dent Assoc, Vol 111, No 5, 799-801.
© 1985 American Dental Association

This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Morris, A.
Right arrow Articles by Bomba, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Morris, A.
Right arrow Articles by Bomba, M.
Journal of the American Dental Association, Vol 111, Issue 5, 799-801
Copyright © 1985 by American Dental Association


Journal Article

Response of general practitioners to a national dental office evaluation program. Office of Quality Assurance



AL Morris, JM Bentley, and MR Bomba

The methods used and the results achieved in an effort to solicit 300 volunteers to test the feasibility of a dental office assessment instrument have been described. In response to personal letters to general practitioners in 14 states, 13.9% returned a card indicating a willingness to consider participation. The response rate from different states ranged from 8% to 21.7% with the response being more favorable from states with fewer dentists. Year of graduation from dental school had little effect on the rate of response. Rural dentists responded at a slightly more favorable rate. Of dentists responding, 71% did so within 2 weeks and 90% within the first month after receiving the solicitation. Mail solicitation can be used successfully in recruiting private practitioners for participation in an in-office practice assessment program.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum Exp ToxicolHome page
L. Jones, J. Bunnell, and J. Stillman
A 30-year follow-up of residual effects on New Zealand School Dental Nurses, from occupational mercury exposure
Human and Experimental Toxicology, April 1, 2007; 26(4): 367 - 375.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright©1995-1985 American Dental Association (ADA).
Reproduction or republication strictly prohibited without prior written permission of ADA.