The Journal of the American Dental Association
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Am Dent Assoc, Vol 114, No 6, 783-786.
© 1987 American Dental Association

This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fitzgerald, M
Right arrow Articles by Charbeneau, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fitzgerald, M
Right arrow Articles by Charbeneau, G.
Journal of the American Dental Association, Vol 114, Issue 6, 783-786
Copyright © 1987 by American Dental Association


Journal Article

An evaluation of a glass ionomer luting agent: bacterial leakage



M Fitzgerald, RJ Heys, DR Heys, and GT Charbeneau

This study quantitatively evaluates the bacterial leakage beneath crowns cemented with a glass ionomer cement compared with those cemented with a polycarboxylate cement or a varnish plus zinc phosphate cement. Bacterial samples were taken from beneath full crowns cemented with the test luting agents 3, 10, and 56 days after cementation. Two-way analysis of variance of the resultant data showed a significant increase in bacterial counts for zinc phosphate, a significant decrease for polycarboxylate, and no change for glass ionomer. These findings suggest that bacterial leakage may not be the reason for the reported poor clinical response associated with glass ionomer luting agents.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright©1995-1987 American Dental Association (ADA).
Reproduction or republication strictly prohibited without prior written permission of ADA.