The Journal of the American Dental Association
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

J Am Dent Assoc, Vol 118, No 1, 67-72.
© 1989 American Dental Association
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wolff, L.
Right arrow Articles by Bandt, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wolff, L.
Right arrow Articles by Bandt, C.
Journal of the American Dental Association, Vol 118, Issue 1, 67-72
Copyright © 1989 by American Dental Association

Clinical Trial

Four-year investigation of salt and peroxide regimen compared with conventional oral hygiene



LF Wolff, BL Pihlstrom, MB Bakdash, EM Schaffer, DM Aeppli, and CL Bandt
Department of Preventive Science, University of Minnesota, School of Dentistry, Minneapolis 55455.

This study of 171 subjects compared the effectiveness of a patient-applied salt and peroxide oral hygiene regimen with the use of conventional oral hygiene methods on clinical measures of periodontal disease, and determined patient compliance with and acceptance of using these two oral hygiene regimens. Results indicated that both regimens, when combined with professional care, were effective in changing clinical measures of periodontal disease to a state favoring periodontal health.




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright©1995-1989 American Dental Association (ADA).
Reproduction or republication strictly prohibited without prior written permission of ADA.