The Journal of the American Dental Association
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Am Dent Assoc, Vol 118, No 2, 205-208.
© 1989 American Dental Association

This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hastreiter, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hastreiter, R.
Journal of the American Dental Association, Vol 118, Issue 2, 205-208
Copyright © 1989 by American Dental Association


Journal Article

Is 0.4% stannous fluoride gel an effective agent for the prevention of oral diseases?



RJ Hastreiter

Minnesota Department of Health, Minneapolis 55440.

Research does not support the concept that 0.4% stannous fluoride gels are the preferred preventive or treatment agents for hypersensitivity, plaque, gingivitis, or periodontitis. The only clinically proved, cost-beneficial indications for use of these materials are for the prevention of enamel decalcification in patients wearing banded orthodontic appliances and for the prevention of dental caries in patients who have had head and neck radiation therapy. Even for these applications, other fluoride products may have equal effectiveness.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright©1995-1989 American Dental Association (ADA).
Reproduction or republication strictly prohibited without prior written permission of ADA.