Many technical factors and treatment philosophies affect the way dental radiology is practiced. Some, like minimum tube filtration, are legislated. Others, like proper darkroom techniques, are universally acknowledged as essential. Still others, like the selection of an image receptor and the selection of the type of examination, are the subject of much discussion and debate. This article addresses some of the more controversial options and choices facing dental practitioners by reviewing the standard assessment techniques available to help make appropriate decisions, by summarizing and analyzing available data, and by offering recommendations for practice.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				Z Z Akarslan, M Akdevelioglu, K Gungor, and H Erten A comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of bitewing, periapical, unfiltered and filtered digital panoramic images for approximal caries detection in posterior teeth Dentomaxillofac. Radiol., December 1, 2008; 37(8): 458 - 463. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N Akkaya, O Kansu, H Kansu, L. Cagirankaya, and U Arslan Comparing the accuracy of panoramic and intraoral radiography in the diagnosis of proximal caries. Dentomaxillofac. Radiol., May 1, 2006; 35(3): 170 - 174. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]