The Journal of the American Dental Association
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

J Am Dent Assoc, Vol 120, No 1, 59-62.
© 1990 American Dental Association
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Christensen, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Christensen, G.
Journal of the American Dental Association, Vol 120, Issue 1, 59-62
Copyright © 1990 by American Dental Association

Journal Article

Glass ionomer as a luting material



GJ Christensen
Brigham Young University, Provo, UT.

Glass ionomer cements have been accepted by many practitioners as reliable luting materials. However, some dentists have condemned them because of frequent postoperative tooth sensitivity and difficult working characteristics. Reasons for apparent erratic postoperative behavior of glass ionomer luting agents are discussed. Comparisons with other commonly used cements are made, and a suggested clinical cementation procedure is described.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J. Dent. Res.Home page
C.K.Y. Yiu, F.R. Tay, N.M. King, D.H. Pashley, S.K. Sidhu, J.C.L. Neo, M. Toledano, and S.L. Wong
Interaction of Glass-ionomer Cements with Moist Dentin
J. Dent. Res., April 1, 2004; 83(4): 283 - 289.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright©1995-1990 American Dental Association (ADA).
Reproduction or republication strictly prohibited without prior written permission of ADA.