The Journal of the American Dental Association
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Am Dent Assoc, Vol 120, No 5, 595-596.
© 1990 American Dental Association

This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Journal of the American Dental Association, Vol 120, Issue 5, 595-596
Copyright © 1990 by American Dental Association


Journal Article

Vinyl polysiloxane impression materials: a status report. Council on Dental Materials, Instruments, and Equipment




Results of investigations of vinyl polysiloxanes indicate that they produce highly accurate impressions, have excellent elastic recovery, minimal permanent deformation, and adequate tear strength. A number of vinyl polysiloxanes are certified by the American Dental Association. All of these materials provide clinically acceptable results. Advantages of using the vinyl polysiloxanes include the ability of the impression to be poured up after 1 hour or 1 day, or for some products, after 1 week without significant loss of accuracy; the possibility of repouring the impression a second time and producing an accurate cast; the impression materials are available in several viscosities allowing flexibility in choosing an impression technique; and they can be immersed in recommended disinfectants without affecting the accuracy of the impression. The disadvantages of using the vinyl polysiloxanes include a difficulty in lengthening the working time of products without retarders and a high surface tension making it difficult to wet the impression when pouring up a stone cast. Hydrophilic materials appear to facilitate the casting of the impressions with stone. The automixing devices seem to provide convenience without sacrificing the quality of the impression and are currently available for several products. As with all elastomeric impression materials, proper handling is necessary to ensure the best results. The vinyl polysiloxanes seem to be an excellent choice of impression materials for many clinical situations.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright©1995-1990 American Dental Association (ADA).
Reproduction or republication strictly prohibited without prior written permission of ADA.