The Journal of the American Dental Association
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Am Dent Assoc, Vol 122, No 10, 51-56.
© 1991 American Dental Association

This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hastreiter, R.
Right arrow Articles by Merchant, V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hastreiter, R.
Right arrow Articles by Merchant, V.
Journal of the American Dental Association, Vol 122, Issue 10, 51-56
Copyright © 1991 by American Dental Association


Journal Article

Effectiveness of dental office instrument sterilization procedures



RJ Hastreiter, JA Molinari, MC Falken, MH Roesch, MJ Gleason, and VA Merchant

Dental Health Section, Minnesota Department of Health, Minneapolis 55440.

To evaluate instrument sterilization procedures in Minnesota, biological indicators were used to monitor 406 sterilizers in 381 dental offices. Findings suggest a general improvement in instrument performance over that of a decade ago, but sterilization failure rates are still too high. Sterilizer operator errors are a major cause of sterilization failures. BIs are useful in monitoring sterilization performance only when sterilization procedures are performed consistently and competently by well-trained staff using adequately maintained equipment.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright©1995-1991 American Dental Association (ADA).
Reproduction or republication strictly prohibited without prior written permission of ADA.