| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
|
J Am Dent Assoc, Vol 124, No 5, 46-54.
© 1993 American Dental Association |
Journal Article |
All North Carolina general dentists were shown color photographs of three non-carious cervical lesions. A fourth picture showed cervical caries. Respondents were asked how they defined each lesion, its cause, treatment and frequency of appearance in practice. Cervical caries was identified and treated by almost all responding dentists, but they applied more varied terms, causes and treatments to non-carious defects.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  T. C. AW, X. LEPE, G. H. JOHNSON, and L. A. MANCL A three-year clinical evaluation of two-bottle versus one-bottle dentin adhesives J Am Dent Assoc, March 1, 2005; 136(3): 311 - 322. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. A. LITONJUA, S. ANDREANA, P. J. BUSH, T. S. TOBIAS, and R. E. COHEN Noncarious cervical lesions and abfractions: A re-evaluation J Am Dent Assoc, July 1, 2003; 134(7): 845 - 850. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. C. AW, X. LEPE, G. H. JOHNSON, and L. MANCL Characteristics of noncarious cervical lesions: A clinical investigation J Am Dent Assoc, June 1, 2002; 133(6): 725 - 733. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
