The authors compared the retention and clinical performance of a resin-modified glass ionomer, or RMGI, restorative and a light-cured resin sealant. The first permanent molars on one side of the dental arch in 50 children were sealed with an RMGI, and the same teeth on the other side were sealed with a resin sealant. At baseline, six months after placement and one year after placement, examiners documented sealant retention, secondary caries, marginal discrepancy and marginal staining. In general, the RMGI appeared to wear markedly. At one year, the retention of the RMGI was significantly less than the resin, but the RMGI had significantly fewer marginal discrepancies. There were no significant differences in caries development or marginal discoloration.