The Journal of the American Dental Association
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

J Am Dent Assoc, Vol 127, No 3, 345-349.
© 1996 American Dental Association
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mahler, D.
Right arrow Articles by Terkla, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mahler, D.
Right arrow Articles by Terkla, L.
Related Collections
Right arrow Restoratives
Journal of the American Dental Association, Vol 127, Issue 3, 345-349
Copyright © 1996 by American Dental Association

RESEARCH

One-year clinical evaluation of bonded amalgam restorations



DB Mahler, JH Engle, LE Simms, and LG Terkla
Department of Biomaterials and Biomechanics, Oregon Health Sciences University, School of Dentistry, Portland 97201-3097, USA.

Using one selected amalgam bonding agent, the authors evaluated bonded and unbonded restorations in clinical service. Based on postoperative sensitivity one to two weeks after placement and marginal fracture at one year, no difference was found between the bonded and unbonded restorations. Furthermore, some technical difficulties were experienced with use of the bonding agent.




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright©1995-1996 American Dental Association (ADA).
Reproduction or republication strictly prohibited without prior written permission of ADA.