|
|
||||||||
|
J Am Dent Assoc, Vol 127, No 3, 345-349.
© 1996 American Dental Association | ![]() |
RESEARCH |
Using one selected amalgam bonding agent, the authors evaluated bonded and unbonded restorations in clinical service. Based on postoperative sensitivity one to two weeks after placement and marginal fracture at one year, no difference was found between the bonded and unbonded restorations. Furthermore, some technical difficulties were experienced with use of the bonding agent.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J.B. SUMMITT, J.O. BURGESS, T.G. BERRY, J.W. ROBBINS, J.W. OSBORNE, and C.W. HAVEMAN The performance of bonded vs. pin-retained complex amalgam restorations: A five-year clinical evaluation J Am Dent Assoc, July 1, 2001; 132(7): 923 - 931. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. D. BROWNING, W. W. JOHNSON, and P. N. GREGORY CLINICAL PERFORMANCE OF BONDED AMALGAM RESTORATIONS AT 42 MONTHS J Am Dent Assoc, May 1, 2000; 131(5): 607 - 611. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. B. MAHLER and J. H. ENGLE Clinical Evaluation of Amalgam Bonding in Class I and II Restorations J Am Dent Assoc, January 1, 2000; 131(1): 43 - 49. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |