The Journal of the American Dental Association
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

J Am Dent Assoc, Vol 128, No 1, 47-53.
© 1997 American Dental Association
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mormann, W.
Right arrow Articles by Schug, J
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mormann, W.
Right arrow Articles by Schug, J
Related Collections
Right arrow Implants
Journal of the American Dental Association, Vol 128, Issue 1, 47-53
Copyright © 1997 by American Dental Association

RESEARCH

Grinding precision and accuracy of fit of CEREC 2 CAD-CIM inlays



WH Mormann and J Schug
Division of Aesthetic and Computer Restorations, University of Zurich, Dental School, Switzerland.

The authors conducted research to determine the grinding precision and accuracy of fit of ceramic inlays generated with the completely redesigned CEREC 2 computer-assisted design/computer-integrated manufacturing, or CAD-CIM, unit. They found that the grinding precision of the CEREC 2 unit was 2.4 times greater than that of CEREC 1. With CEREC 2, the mean (+/-standard deviation) luting interfaces were 56 +/- 27 micrometers, which is a 30 percent improvement in the accuracy of fit compared with that of CEREC 1.




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright©1995-1997 American Dental Association (ADA).
Reproduction or republication strictly prohibited without prior written permission of ADA.