The Journal of the American Dental Association
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

J Am Dent Assoc, Vol 128, No 2, 195-200.
© 1997 American Dental Association
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Swift, E.
Right arrow Articles by Felton, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Swift, E., Jr
Right arrow Articles by Felton, D.
Related Collections
Right arrow Restoratives
Journal of the American Dental Association, Vol 128, Issue 2, 195-200
Copyright © 1997 by American Dental Association

CLINICAL PRACTICE

The effect of resin desensitizing agents on crown retention



EJ Swift Jr, AH Lloyd, and DA Felton
Department of Operative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill 27599-7450, USA.

Many dentists use resin primers and adhesives to prevent post-cementation sensitivity of teeth restored with crowns. However, little information is available regarding the effect of these resins on crown retention. This laboratory study concluded that two popular resins, Gluma Desensitizer (Heraeus Kulzer) and One-Step (Bisco Dental Products), had little or no effect on the retention of crowns luted with zinc phosphate, glass ionomer or resin-modified glass ionomer cements.




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright©1995-1997 American Dental Association (ADA).
Reproduction or republication strictly prohibited without prior written permission of ADA.