The Journal of the American Dental Association
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Am Dent Assoc, Vol 128, No 4, 481-484.
© 1997 American Dental Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Baergen, R
Right arrow Articles by Baergen, C
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Baergen, R
Right arrow Articles by Baergen, C
Related Collections
Right arrow Practice Management
Journal of the American Dental Association, Vol 128, Issue 4, 481-484
Copyright © 1997 by American Dental Association


PRACTICE MANAGEMENT

Paternalism, risk and patient choice



R Baergen and C Baergen

Department of Philosophy, Idaho State University, Pocatello 83209-8056, USA.

When patients request inappropriate dental treatment, the dentist must decide how to balance a concern with patients' well-being with respect for their choices. The usual paternalist inclinations found in clinical practice and in the literature are rejected. Only in certain situations is the dentist morally justified in setting aside patients' treatment requests. This position is supported by the analysis of a clinical case. There are also implications as to how dentists should respond to colleagues who provide treatments some regard as questionable.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright©1995-1997 American Dental Association (ADA).
Reproduction or republication strictly prohibited without prior written permission of ADA.