HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

J Am Dent Assoc, Vol 129, No 10, 1455-1461. © 1998 American Dental Association

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by BROWN, A. R. Articles by SHULTZ, R. E. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by BROWN, A. R. Articles by SHULTZ, R. E. Related Collections Dental Equipment/Instruments Infection Control

JADA Continuing Education

Recent studies have shown that bacteremia can result from the removal of intraoral sutures. The authors found that preprocedural use of an antimicrobial oral rinse (0.12 percent chlorhexidine) did not significantly reduce the incidence of bacteremia when compared with no rinse at all. Similarly, a significant relationship between bleeding and bacteremia was not apparent. Most of the positive cultures yielded low colony counts. The results support the rationale for the American Heart Association’s 1997 recommendations for use of antibiotic prophylaxis to prevent bacteremia, as well as the importance of good oral hygiene in prevention efforts.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				N. B. Parahitiyawa, L. J. Jin, W. K. Leung, W. C. Yam, and L. P. Samaranayake Microbiology of Odontogenic Bacteremia: beyond Endocarditis Clin. Microbiol. Rev., January 1, 2009; 22(1): 46 - 64. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]