|
|
||||||||
|
J Am Dent Assoc, Vol 129, No 4, 494-503.
© 1998 American Dental Association | ![]() |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ASSOCIATION REPORT |
This report of the Council on Scientific Affairs reviews and discusses recent studies concerning the safety of dental amalgam, with an emphasis on studies that have been published since the 1993 review of dental amalgam by the U.S. Public Health Service Committee to Coordinate Environmental Health and Related Programs. The Council concludes that, based on currently available scientific information, amalgam continues to be a safe and effective restorative material.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
H. W. ROBERTS, M. MAREK, J. C. KUEHNE, and J. C. RAGAIN Disinfectants' effect on mercury release from amalgam J Am Dent Assoc, July 1, 2005; 136(7): 915 - 919. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B A Dye, S E Schober, C F Dillon, R L Jones, C Fryar, M McDowell, and T H Sinks Urinary mercury concentrations associated with dental restorations in adult women aged 16-49 years: United States, 1999-2000 Occup. Environ. Med., June 1, 2005; 62(6): 368 - 375. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
ADA COUNCIL ON SCIENTIFIC AFFAIRS Direct and indirect restorative materials J Am Dent Assoc, April 1, 2003; 134(4): 463 - 472. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. W. ROBERTS, D. LEONARD, and J. OSBORNE Potential health and environmental issues of mercury-contaminated amalgamators J Am Dent Assoc, January 1, 2001; 132(1): 58 - 64. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. A. FREITAS JR. NANODENTISTRY J Am Dent Assoc, November 1, 2000; 131(11): 1559 - 1565. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |