The Journal of the American Dental Association
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Am Dent Assoc, Vol 130, No 1, 104-108.
© 1999 American Dental Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by ISAACS, R. L.
Right arrow Articles by WARREN, P. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by ISAACS, R. L.
Right arrow Articles by WARREN, P. R.
Related Collections
Right arrow Dental Equipment/Instruments

ADVANCES IN DENTAL PRODUCTS

ASSESSING THE EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF AN ELECTRIC INTERDENTAL CLEANING DEVICE



ROGER L. ISAACS, D.D.S., BRADLEY B. BEISWANGER, D.D.S, JODIE L. CRAWFORD, R.D.H., MELISSA S. MAU, B.S., HOWARD PROSKIN, PH.D. and PAUL R. WARREN, L.D.S.

Background. Although routine interdental cleaning is important and recommended by dental professionals, compliance has been relatively low. To aid in improving compliance, an electrically powered device has been developed.

Methods. This six-month randomized, single-blinded, parallel-group study was conducted to compare the long-term efficacy and safety of a new interdental cleaning device (Braun Oral-B Interclean, model ID2) with those of an ADA-approved waxed dental floss in healthy adults.

Results. The authors found no statistically significant difference between the two products with respect to the gingival index or gingival bleeding index after three or six months of use. A one-time product use, at the six-month examination, confirmed the equivalency of the two methods with respect to removal of dental plaque. The oral soft-tissue status of both groups of subjects also remained comparable throughout the study.

Conclusion. Use of the interdental cleaning device and dental floss resulted in comparable benefits with respect to gingival health and plaque removal.

Clinical Implications. Although it was not shown to be an improvement over dental floss, the cleaning device was comparable in every respect. Since it can be used with one hand and does not require as much dexterity as floss, the device warrants consideration by those who lack the motivation or are unable to use dental floss.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright©1995-1999 American Dental Association (ADA).
Reproduction or republication strictly prohibited without prior written permission of ADA.