The Journal of the American Dental Association
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Am Dent Assoc, Vol 130, No 7, 1104-1110.
© 1999 American Dental Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by SULEIMAN, O. H.
Right arrow Articles by ANTONSEN, R. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by SULEIMAN, O. H.
Right arrow Articles by ANTONSEN, R. G., JR.

TRENDS

RADIOGRAPHIC TRENDS OF DENTAL OFFICES AND DENTAL SCHOOLS



ORHAN H. SULEIMAN, M.S., PH.D., DAVID C. SPELIC, PH.D., BURTON CONWAY, M.S., JUNE C. HART, B.S., R.T., PENNY R. BOYCE, B.S., R.T. and ROBERT G. ANTONSEN JR., B.S., R.T.

Background. A survey of private practice facilities in the United States that perform dental radiography was conducted in 1993 and repeated in dental schools in 1995–1996.

Methods. Both surveys were conducted as part of the Nationwide Evaluation of X-ray Trends, or NEXT, survey program. A representative sample of dental facilities from each participating state were surveyed, and data on patient radiation exposure, radiographic technique, film-image quality, film-processing quality and darkroom fog were collected.

Results. The authors found that dental schools use E-speed film more frequently than do private practice facilities. The use of E-speed film and better film processing by dental schools resulted in lower patient radiation exposures without sacrificing image quality. The authors also found that dental school darkrooms had lower ambient fog levels than did those of private practice facilities.

Conclusions. The distribution for the 1993 NEXT survey facilities was greater than that observed for dental schools for radiation exposure, film-processing quality and darkroom fog. Dental schools, in general, had better film quality and lower radiation exposures than did private practice facilities.

Practice Implications. Facilities need to emphasize better quality processing and the use of E-speed film to reduce patient exposure and improve image quality.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
D. C. Spelic, R. V. Kaczmarek, and O. H. Suleiman
Nationwide Evaluation of X-ray Trends Survey of Abdomen and Lumbosacral Spine Radiography
Radiology, July 1, 2004; 232(1): 115 - 125.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
P. P. Hujoel, A.-M. Bollen, C. J. Noonan, and M. A. del Aguila
Antepartum Dental Radiography and Infant Low Birth Weight
JAMA, April 28, 2004; 291(16): 1987 - 1993.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright©1995-1999 American Dental Association (ADA).
Reproduction or republication strictly prohibited without prior written permission of ADA.