| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
|
J Am Dent Assoc, Vol 130, No 7, 957-965.
© 1999 American Dental Association |  |
RESEARCH |
Background. This study evaluated the efficacy of combined intermittent and continuous treatment with diluted sodium hypochlorite, or NaClO, to improve dental unit water quality in a clinical setting.
Methods. In this prospective study, 10 dental units were fitted with separate water reservoir systems. Dental units were maintained with weekly rinses with 1:10 NaClO. Treatment water consisted of 750 milliliters of tap water and one drop of undiluted commercial bleach. Bacterial contamination in the effluent coolant water was assayed via microbiologic culture on a weekly basis. At the end of the study, scanning electron microscopy of the inner surfaces of the dental unit waterlines corroborated the results.
Results. All 10 dental units consistently delivered water with less than 10 colony-forming units per milliliter, or CFU/mL, with a mean bacterial contamination of less than 1 CFU/mL. Baseline scanning electron microscopy demonstrated biofilm formation. Scanning electron microscopy at the end of the study demonstrated the lack of features consistent with biofilm formation. Although tri-halomethanes were detected in output water, all samples were below Environmental Protection Agency limits for drinking water.
Conclusions. Weekly treatment with 5.25 percent NaClO diluted 1:10, and concomitant use of chlorinated treatment water (3 parts per million chlorine) consistently attained the proposed American Dental Association goal of fewer than 200 CFU/mL in the unfiltered output. The effects of continuous treatment on dentin and enamel bond strength may require further evaluation.
Clinical Implications. The success of this protocol suggests that optimal attainment of dental water quality goals may require a combination of approaches.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  T. Yabune, S. Imazato, and S. Ebisu Assessment of Inhibitory Effects of Fluoride-Coated Tubes on Biofilm Formation by Using the In Vitro Dental Unit Waterline Biofilm Model Appl. Envir. Microbiol., October 1, 2008; 74(19): 5958 - 5964. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. V. Ritter, E. Ghaname, and R. H. Leonard The influence of dental unit waterline cleaners on composite-to-dentin bond strengths J Am Dent Assoc, July 1, 2007; 138(7): 985 - 991. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. J. Schel, P. D. Marsh, D. J. Bradshaw, M. Finney, M. R. Fulford, E. Frandsen, E. Ostergaard, J. M. ten Cate, W. R. Moorer, A. Mavridou, et al. Comparison of the Efficacies of Disinfectants To Control Microbial Contamination in Dental Unit Water Systems in General Dental Practices across the European Union Appl. Envir. Microbiol., February 1, 2006; 72(2): 1380 - 1387. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. W. McDOWELL, D. S. PAULSON, and J. A. MITCHELL A simulated-use evaluation of a strategy for preventing biofilm formation in dental unit waterlines J Am Dent Assoc, June 1, 2004; 135(6): 799 - 805. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. T. Walker, D. J. Bradshaw, M. R. Fulford, and P. D. Marsh Microbiological Evaluation of a Range of Disinfectant Products To Control Mixed-Species Biofilm Contamination in a Laboratory Model of a Dental Unit Water System Appl. Envir. Microbiol., June 1, 2003; 69(6): 3327 - 3332. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. G. DEPAOLA, D. MANGAN, S. E. MILLS, W. COSTERTON, J. BARBEAU, B. SHEARER, and J. BARTLETT A review of the science regarding dental unit waterlines J Am Dent Assoc, September 1, 2002; 133(9): 1199 - 1206. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. E. MILLS THE DENTAL UNIT WATERLINE CONTROVERSY: DEFUSING THE MYTHS, DEFINING THE SOLUTIONS J Am Dent Assoc, October 1, 2000; 131(10): 1427 - 1441. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
