The Journal of the American Dental Association
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Am Dent Assoc, Vol 130, No 9, 1325-1329.
© 1999 American Dental Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by TSANG, A.
Right arrow Articles by WOOD, R. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by TSANG, A.
Right arrow Articles by WOOD, R. E.
Related Collections
Right arrow Imaging

CLINICAL PRACTICE

JADA Continuing Education

POTENTIAL FOR FRAUDULENT USE OF DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHY



ANDREW TSANG, D.M.D., DAVID SWEET, D.M.D., PH.D. and ROBERT E. WOOD, D.D.S., M.SC., PH.D.

Background. Digital radiographic images can be manipulated using personal computers. To test the potential for fraudulent use, the authors altered a series of dental radiographs, printed them to simulate duplicated films and submitted them for authorization of proposed treatment.

Materials and Methods. The authors obtained periapical radiographs of teeth that contained small restorations or were unrestored from the files of three dental patients at a private dental practice. The authors used a flatbed scanner to digitize and import the radiographs into a computer. Then they added dental caries, large restorations, fractures and periapical pathosis to the radiographs. The authors proposed to the insurance companies that the teeth in question be restored using expensive treatment, such as root-canal therapy and full-coverage crowns.

Results. In each case, the insurance companies authorized the proposed treatment based on the appearance of the teeth on the radiographs. The altered images illustrated an apparent need for dental treatment that was not required and that could have led to payment for treatment that was not actually performed.

Conclusions. This study illustrates the potential for the fraudulent use of manipulated digital radiographic images.

Clinical Implications. Dentistry should be aware of the implications of the potential for such abuse and should develop measures both to prevent it from occurring and to facilitate its detection.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of the American Dental AssociationHome page
P. F. VAN DER STELT
Filmless imaging: The uses of digital radiography in dental practice
J Am Dent Assoc, October 1, 2005; 136(10): 1379 - 1387.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch DermatolHome page
Photographic Images, Digital Imaging, Dermatology, and the Law
Arch Dermatol, April 1, 2004; 140(4): 473 - 476.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright©1995-1999 American Dental Association (ADA).
Reproduction or republication strictly prohibited without prior written permission of ADA.