The Journal of the American Dental Association
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Am Dent Assoc, Vol 130, No 9, 1341-1343.
© 1999 American Dental Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by MOORE, P. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by MOORE, P. A.
Related Collections
Right arrow Pharmacology

CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY

JADA Continuing Education

DENTAL THERAPEUTIC INDICATIONS FOR THE NEWER LONG-ACTING MACROLIDE ANTIBIOTICS



PAUL A. MOORE, D.M.D., PH.D.

Background. When treating oral infections, clinicians have used the macrolide antibiotic eryth-romycin as an alternative antibiotic for patients who have documented allergic reactions to penicillins. In this article, the author reports on his assessment of the pharmacology of erythromycin and the newer macrolide antibiotics, as well as of their indications for the prevention of bacterial endocarditis and their possible use for oral-dental infections.

Types of Studies Reviewed. The author reviewed the current clinical pharmacology literature with specific emphasis on reports indicating these antibiotics’ efficacy in treating oral-dental infections.

Results. Azithromycin, clarithromycin and dirithromycin are erythromycin analogues that are currently marketed in the United States. All three have the therapeutic advantages over erythromycin of longer durations of action, enhanced acid stabilities and improved tissue distributions. A lower incidence of gastrointestinal distress and abdominal cramping is reported for all three of these newer agents than for erythromycin. Azithromycin and dirithromycin do not appear to compete for the same hepatic drug-metabolizing enzymes as erythromycin and therefore are not associated with the same drug interactions.

Conclusions and Clinical Implications. The newer macrolide antibiotics offer the advantage of fewer adverse gastrointestinal effects than erythromycin and dosing regimens of only once or twice a day. Yet, the extremely high price of the newer macrolides compared with that of erythromycin limits their routine use.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JDRHome page
C.-H. Chou and J.D. Walters
Clarithromycin Transport by Gingival Fibroblasts and Epithelial Cells
Journal of Dental Research, August 1, 2008; 87(8): 777 - 781.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright©1995-1999 American Dental Association (ADA).
Reproduction or republication strictly prohibited without prior written permission of ADA.