HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

J Am Dent Assoc, Vol 131, No 10, 1472-1477. © 2000 American Dental Association

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by PERRY, R. Articles by ESTAFAN, D. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by PERRY, R. Articles by ESTAFAN, D. Related Collections Restoratives

CONVENTIONAL METHODS VS. THREE-DIMENSIONAL LASER DIGITIZER

The purpose of this study was to compare three-dimensional laser digitizing with subjective evaluations of wear in posterior resin-based composite restorations during a 24-month period.

Background. The authors describe an indirect method of analyzing wear in resin-based composite restorations. A computer-driven laser was used to scan stone casts of restorations and create three-dimensional computerized surface models of the teeth. A standard computer algorithm was used to superimpose the follow-up model images over the baseline model images and to calculate the amount of wear within 10 micrometers.

Methods. Patients were selected whose treatment plans required a Class II restoration. A total of 100 restorations were inserted at baseline and evaluated at six months, 12 months and 24 months. Polyether quadrant impressions were taken and casts were made. Twenty-one casts were selected for the three-dimensional laser digitizing technique. The same casts were evaluated via subjective evaluations using sets of 18 calibrated standard models, following the method developed by Leinfelder.

Results. Statistical analysis using the Wilcoxon test revealed significant differences (P < .01) between subjective wear evaluation and the three-dimensional laser digitizing wear analysis.

Conclusion. The normalized three-dimensional laser digitizing technique is significantly more effective than subjective evaluations in establishing restoration wear rates.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				E. C.M. POON, R. J. SMALES, and K. H.-K. YIP Clinical evaluation of packable and conventional hybrid posterior resin-based composites: Results at 3.5 years J Am Dent Assoc, November 1, 2005; 136(11): 1533 - 1540. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]