The Journal of the American Dental Association
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Am Dent Assoc, Vol 131, No 4, 453-462.
© 2000 American Dental Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by HOROWITZ, A. M.
Right arrow Articles by YELLOWITZ, J. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by HOROWITZ, A. M.
Right arrow Articles by YELLOWITZ, J. A.
Related Collections
Right arrow Practice Management

COVER STORY

JADA Continuing Education

Oral Pharyngeal Cancer Prevention and Early Detection

Dentists’ Opinions and Practices



ALICE M. HOROWITZ, PH.D., THOMAS F. DRURY, PH.D., HAROLD S. GOODMAN, D.M.D., M.P.H. and JANET A. YELLOWITZ, D.M.D., M.P.H.

Background. The five-year survival rate for patients in the United States diagnosed with oral pharyngeal cancer is 52 percent, which suggests that these cancers are diagnosed at late stages. The authors conducted this study to determine U.S. dentists’ opinions and practices regarding oral cancer prevention and early detection.

Methods. The authors mailed a pretested survey to 7,000 randomly selected general practitioners. A total of 3,200 dentists provided information on how they conduct oral cancer examinations, their use of health history questions to assess patients’ oral cancer risks and their oral cancer training and practices. The authors carried out analyses using unweighted data; both bivariate and logistic analytical techniques at a P ≤ .01 level of significance were used.

Results. On average, dentists assessed about five of the eight health history items on the survey. Eighty-six percent indicated that they did not conduct oral cancer examinations on edentulous patients 18 years of age or older; 81 percent, however, reported that they conducted oral cancer examinations for 100 percent of their patients 40 years of age or older on their initial appointment.

Conclusions. The reported practices of these dentists regarding oral cancer, in conjunction with their opinions about key aspects of these practices and their training, point to a need for systematic educational updates in oral cancer prevention and early detection.

Clinical Implications. Dentists need to determine their patients’ risks for oral cancers and provide routine and comprehensive oral cancer examinations.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Crit. Rev. Oral Biol. Med.Home page
U. Mattsson, M. Jontell, and P. Holmstrup
ORAL LICHEN PLANUS AND MALIGNANT TRANSFORMATION: IS A RECALL OF PATIENTS JUSTIFIED?
Crit. Rev. Oral. Biol. Med., September 1, 2002; 13(5): 390 - 396.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CA Cancer J ClinHome page
B. W. Neville and T. A. Day
Oral Cancer and Precancerous Lesions
CA Cancer J Clin, July 1, 2002; 52(4): 195 - 215.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Health Promot PractHome page
M. T. Canto, T. F. Drury, and A. M. Horowitz
Maryland Dentists' Knowledge of Oral Cancer Risk Factors and Diagnostic Procedures
Health Promot Pract, July 1, 2001; 2(3): 255 - 262.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright©1995-2000 American Dental Association (ADA).
Reproduction or republication strictly prohibited without prior written permission of ADA.