The Journal of the American Dental Association
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Am Dent Assoc, Vol 131, No 4, 463-467.
© 2000 American Dental Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by HOKETT, S. D.
Right arrow Articles by HOEN, M. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by HOKETT, S. D.
Right arrow Articles by HOEN, M. M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Infection Control

RESEARCH

ASSESSING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF DIRECT DIGITAL

RADIOGRAPHY BARRIER SHEATHS AND FINGER COTS



STEVEN D. HOKETT, D.D.S., JAMES R. HONEY, D.M.D., FRANCISCO RUIZ, D.M.D., MICHAEL K. BAISDEN, D.D.S. and MICHAEL M. HOEN, D.D.S.

Background. Effective cross-contamination prevention is critical for direct digital radiography, or DDR, sensors, which are not sterilizeable; however, current manufacturers’ recommendations for standard precautions are limited to the use of plastic barrier sheaths, which are commonly known to tear or leak. The authors sought to determine the incidence of digital radiography barrier-sheath leakage, with and without additional latex finger cot protection, as measured by a water pressure test.

Methods. Four hundred plastic barrier sheaths were randomly assigned to four groups based on intraoral radiograph positioning device use and supplemental barrier protection with a latex finger cot. Sheaths were carefully placed to cover DDR sensors for a single intraoral use, gently removed from the sensors and tested for leakage through a water pressure technique.

Results. Perforations occurred in 44 to 51 percent of plastic sheaths after a single radiographic exposure. However, only up to 6 percent of the plastic sheaths that were covered by a latex finger cot leaked during the water pressure test.

Conclusions. At least 44 percent of the plastic barrier sheaths leaked after a single intraoral radiographic exposure. Use of a latex finger cot over the plastic sheath significantly reduced leakage to no more than 6 percent.

Clinical Implications. Latex finger cots used in conjunction with the standard plastic sheaths that cover DDR sensors may more effectively prevent cross-contamination than do plastic sheaths alone. Dentists who use DDR sensors during highly invasive dental procedures such as dental implant surgery are encouraged to consider supplemental barrier protection for these delicate, expensive and nonsterilizeable sensors to prevent patient cross-contamination.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright©1995-2000 American Dental Association (ADA).
Reproduction or republication strictly prohibited without prior written permission of ADA.