The Journal of the American Dental Association
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Am Dent Assoc, Vol 131, No 4, 497-503.
© 2000 American Dental Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by CONDON, J. R.
Right arrow Articles by FERRACANE, J. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by CONDON, J. R.
Right arrow Articles by FERRACANE, J. L.

BIOMATERIALS/RESTORATIVE DENTISTRY

ASSESSING THE EFFECT OF COMPOSITE FORMULATION ON POLYMERIZATION STRESS



JOHN R. CONDON, B.S. and JACK L. FERRACANE, PH.D.

Background. In this study, the authors measured the magnitude of the polymerization stress of a variety of dental composite materials and explored the effect of a novel monomer, a methacrylated derivative of styrene-allyl alcohol, or MSAA, in reducing polymerization stress.

Methods. Eleven commercially available composites and a series of experimental composites were evaluated in a mechanical testing machine to measure the maximum stress generated during placement in a confined setting.

Results. A significant relationship between higher filler volume and increased polymerization stress was found among the commercial materials. Introduction of MSAA produced a 30 percent reduction in polymerization stress in an experimental composite material.

Conclusions. Composites that contain lower levels of inorganic filler particles are less likely to produce high levels of polymerization stress during placement. Modifications to traditional composite chemistry can result in materials that produce lower polymerization stress levels.

Clinical Implications. The polymerization stress produced by dental composite materials during light-curing is a leading reason for bond failures in adhesive restorations, resulting in postoperative sensitivity, marginal staining and recurrent caries.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Dent. Res.Home page
F. Goncalves, C.S. Pfeifer, J.L. Ferracane, and R.R. Braga
Contraction Stress Determinants in Dimethacrylate Composites
J. Dent. Res., April 1, 2008; 87(4): 367 - 371.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Crit. Rev. Oral Biol. Med.Home page
R.R. Braga and J.L. Ferracane
ALTERNATIVES IN POLYMERIZATION CONTRACTION STRESS MANAGEMENT
Crit. Rev. Oral. Biol. Med., May 1, 2004; 15(3): 176 - 184.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Biomater ApplHome page
Z. C. Cuehrel[UNKNOWN], F. Tasman, M. A.[U. Onur, and A. Gumrukcuoglu
Influence of a Self-Etching Primer on Compound Nerve Action Potentials
J Biomater Appl, January 1, 2004; 18(3): 153 - 161.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J. Dent. Res.Home page
R.R. Braga and J.L. Ferracane
Contraction Stress Related to Degree of Conversion and Reaction Kinetics
J. Dent. Res., February 1, 2002; 81(2): 114 - 118.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright©1995-2000 American Dental Association (ADA).
Reproduction or republication strictly prohibited without prior written permission of ADA.