HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

J Am Dent Assoc, Vol 131, No 5, 607-611. © 2000 American Dental Association

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by BROWNING, W. D. Articles by GREGORY, P. N. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by BROWNING, W. D. Articles by GREGORY, P. N. Related Collections Esthestics

JADA Continuing Education

Background. Despite a lack of data based on clinical research, many positive characteristics have been attributed to the placement of amalgam restorations with an adhesive resin liner.

Methods. For 42 months, the authors followed two groups of subjects who had amalgam restorations placed in a previous study. In this double-blind study, these subjects had been randomly assigned to have amalgam restorations placed with an adhesive liner or with a copal varnish placed under all restorations and a bulk base of zinc phosphate cement for deeper lesions. The authors evaluated anatomical form, marginal adaptation, retention and the presence of secondary caries at six, 18, 30 and 42 months.

Results. At 42 months, the authors found that all restorations in both groups still were retained, were free of secondary caries and were rated clinically acceptable. No difference between the groups was found for any category (P > .05; analysis).

Conclusions. Placement of amalgam restorations with adhesive liners was found to produce results equivalent to that of traditional methods over a 42-month period.

Clinical Implications. Practitioners wary of using new methods that have not undergone thorough clinical testing can feel comfortable placing adhesive liners under amalgam restorations.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				Z. MACH, J. REGENT, M. STANINEC, L. MRKLAS, and J. C. SETCOS The integrity of bonded amalgam restorations: A clinical evaluation after five years J Am Dent Assoc, April 1, 2002; 133(4): 460 - 467. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J.B. SUMMITT, J.O. BURGESS, T.G. BERRY, J.W. ROBBINS, J.W. OSBORNE, and C.W. HAVEMAN The performance of bonded vs. pin-retained complex amalgam restorations: A five-year clinical evaluation J Am Dent Assoc, July 1, 2001; 132(7): 923 - 931. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]