HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by PENDRYS, D. G. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by PENDRYS, D. G.

JADA Continuing Education

Background. Few studies have evaluated the impact of specific fluoride sources on the prevalence of enamel fluorosis in the population. The author conducted research to determine attributable risk percent estimates for mild-to-moderate enamel fluorosis in two populations of middle-school–aged children.

Methods. The author recruited two groups of children 10 to 14 years of age. One group of 429 had grown up in nonfluoridated communities; the other group of 234 had grown up in optimally fluoridated communities. Trained examiners measured enamel fluorosis using the Fluorosis Risk Index and measured early childhood fluoride exposure using a questionnaire completed by the parent. The author then calculated attributable risk percent estimates, or the proportion of cases of mild-to-moderate enamel fluorosis associated with exposure to specific early fluoride sources, based on logistic regression models.

Results. In the nonfluoridated study sample, sixty-five percent of the enamel fluorosis cases were attributed to fluoride supplementation under the pre-1994 protocol. An additional 34 percent were explained by the children having brushed more than once per day during the first two years of life. In the optimally fluoridated study sample, 68 percent of the enamel fluorosis cases were explained by the children using more than a pea-sized amount of toothpaste during the first year of life, 13 percent by having been inappropriately given a fluoride supplement, and 9 percent by the use of infant formula in the form of a powdered concentrate.

Conclusions. Enamel fluorosis in the non-fluoridated study sample was attributed to fluoride supplementation under the pre-1994 protocol and early toothbrushing behaviors. Enamel fluorosis in the optimally fluoridated study sample was attributed to early toothbrushing behaviors, inappropriate fluoride supplementation and the use of infant formula in the form of a powdered concentrate.

Clinical Implications. By advising parents about the best early use of fluoride agents, health professionals play an important role in reducing the prevalence of clinically noticeable enamel fluorosis.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				P. P. Hujoel, L. G. Zina, S. A.S. Moimaz, and J. Cunha-Cruz Infant Formula and Enamel Fluorosis: A Systematic Review J Am Dent Assoc, July 1, 2009; 140(7): 841 - 854. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. I. Ismail and H. Hasson Fluoride supplements, dental caries and fluorosis: A systematic review J Am Dent Assoc, November 1, 2008; 139(11): 1457 - 1468. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L.G. Do and A.J. Spencer Risk-Benefit Balance in the Use of Fluoride among Young Children Journal of Dental Research, August 1, 2007; 86(8): 723 - 728. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. R. Franzman, S. M. Levy, J. J. Warren, and B. Broffitt Fluoride dentifrice ingestion and fluorosis of the permanent incisors J Am Dent Assoc, May 1, 2006; 137(5): 645 - 652. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Vieira, R. Hancock, M. Dumitriu, M. Schwartz, H. Limeback, and M. Grynpas How Does Fluoride Affect Dentin Microhardness and Mineralization? Journal of Dental Research, October 1, 2005; 84(10): 951 - 957. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. P.G.F. VIEIRA, H. P. LAWRENCE, H. LIMEBACK, F. C. SAMPAIO, and M. GRYNPAS A visual analog scale for measuring dental fluorosis severity J Am Dent Assoc, July 1, 2005; 136(7): 895 - 901. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A.P.G.F. Vieira, R. Hancock, H. Limeback, R. Maia, and M.D. Grynpas Is Fluoride Concentration in Dentin and Enamel a Good Indicator of Dental Fluorosis? Journal of Dental Research, January 1, 2004; 83(1): 76 - 80. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E.T. Everett, M.A.K. McHenry, N. Reynolds, H. Eggertsson, J. Sullivan, C. Kantmann, E.A. Martinez-Mier, J.M. Warrick, and G.K. Stookey Dental Fluorosis: Variability among Different Inbred Mouse Strains Journal of Dental Research, November 1, 2002; 81(11): 794 - 798. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. H. BOWEN Fluorosis: Is it really a problem? J Am Dent Assoc, October 1, 2002; 133(10): 1405 - 1407. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]