HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

J Am Dent Assoc, Vol 131, No 9, 1269-1277. © 2000 American Dental Association

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by MOKHLIS, G. R. Articles by ECKERT, G. J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by MOKHLIS, G. R. Articles by ECKERT, G. J. Related Collections Esthestics

JADA Continuing Education

Background. Vital tooth bleaching for esthetic reasons has gained in popularity during the last few years. However, few studies have investigated the efficacy of daytime bleaching products. The purpose of this double-blind in vivo study was to evaluate the efficacy of 20 percent carbamide peroxide, or CP, and 7.5 percent hydrogen peroxide, or HP, during daytime use. The degree of color change, any color relapse, and tooth or gingival sensitivity were evaluated.

Methods. Twenty-four patients participated in this study. The bleaching gels were randomly applied to the right and left maxillary anterior teeth. Patients were shown how to place the two bleaching agents in a custom tray for one hour, twice a day for two weeks. Patients returned in one, two, three, six and 12 weeks for color evaluation with the colorimeter and shade guides as well as to have color slide photographs taken. The authors evaluated sensitivity by asking the patients to record daily for 21 days any tooth or gingival sensitivity they experienced.

Results. Use of the 20 percent CP resulted in significantly more lightness than the 7.5 percent HP during the first 14 days of the study, but at the end of the study, there was no significant difference between products with regard to tooth lightness. In addition, the authors found no statistically significant difference between products with regard to gingival or tooth sensitivity.

Conclusions. Both CP and HP are effective at-home bleaching agents when daytime bleaching is preferred.

Clinical Implications. Dentists who choose to use daytime bleaching can select either CP or HP.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				L. Y. Tay, C. Kose, A. D. Loguercio, and A. Reis Assessing the Effect of a Desensitizing Agent Used Before In-office Tooth Bleaching J Am Dent Assoc, October 1, 2009; 140(10): 1245 - 1251. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. S. Meireles, I. da Silva dos Santos, A. Della Bona, and F. F. Demarco A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial of 10 Percent Versus 16 Percent Carbamide Peroxide Tooth-Bleaching Agents: One-Year Follow-up J Am Dent Assoc, September 1, 2009; 140(9): 1109 - 1117. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. V. Armenio, F. Fitarelli, M. F. Armenio, F. F. Demarco, A. Reis, and A. D. Loguercio The Effect of Fluoride Gel Use on Bleaching Sensitivity: A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial J Am Dent Assoc, May 1, 2008; 139(5): 592 - 597. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. DELIPERI, D. N. BARDWELL, and A. PAPATHANASIOU Clinical evaluation of a combined in-office and take-home bleaching system J Am Dent Assoc, May 1, 2004; 135(5): 628 - 634. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J.E. Dahl and U. Pallesen TOOTH BLEACHING--A CRITICAL REVIEW OF THE BIOLOGICAL ASPECTS Critical Reviews in Oral Biology & Medicine, July 1, 2003; 14(4): 292 - 304. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. G. JORGENSEN and W. B. CARROLL Incidence of tooth sensitivity after home whitening treatment J Am Dent Assoc, August 1, 2002; 133(8): 1076 - 1082. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]