The Journal of the American Dental Association
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Am Dent Assoc, Vol 131, No 9, 1317-1323.
© 2000 American Dental Association

Essential Dental System, Inc.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by SHUGARS, D. A.
Right arrow Articles by BRANTLEY, C. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by SHUGARS, D. A.
Right arrow Articles by BRANTLEY, C. F.
Related Collections
Right arrow Endodontics

CLINICAL PRACTICE

JADA Continuing Education

THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT REPLACING A MISSING POSTERIOR TOOTH



DANIEL A. SHUGARS, D.D.S., PH.D., M.P.H., JAMES D. BADER, D.D.S., M.P.H., S. WARREN PHILLIPS JR., D.D.S., B. ALEXANDER WHITE, D.D.S., M.S., DR.P.H. and C. FRANK BRANTLEY, D.D.S.

Background. Failure to replace a missing posterior tooth is assumed to result in a host of adverse consequences, which include shifting of teeth and loss of alveolar bone support.

Methods. A retrospective longitudinal study (median follow-up period 6.9 years), using the radiographs of 111 patients who had an untreated bounded edentulous space, or BES, was conducted to determine the extent to which these adverse outcomes occurred.

Results. The majority of patients lost 1 millimeter or less of the distance between teeth adjacent to the space, extrusion of the opposing tooth was ≤ 1 mm in 99 percent of the cases, and the amount of alveolar bone loss next to the adjacent teeth was ≤ 1 mm in 83 percent of the cases.

Conclusions. Within the follow-up time in this study, this group of patients did not exhibit the expected adverse consequences with either the frequency or severity generally assumed to be associated with nonreplacement of a single posterior tooth.

Clinical Implications. These findings suggest that for the large majority of patients who experience a single-tooth posterior BES, immediate treatment may not be critical to the maintenance of arch stability. Instead, regular follow-up assessments to monitor change in stability and periodontal health may be warranted.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur J OrthodHome page
P. Christou and S. Kiliaridis
Three-dimensional changes in the position of unopposed molars in adults
Eur J Orthod, December 1, 2007; 29(6): 543 - 549.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JDRHome page
K.L. Gragg, D.A. Shugars, J.D. Bader, J.R. Elter, and B.A. White
Movement of Teeth Adjacent to Posterior Bounded Edentulous Spaces
Journal of Dental Research, November 1, 2001; 80(11): 2021 - 2024.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright©1995-2000 American Dental Association (ADA).
Reproduction or republication strictly prohibited without prior written permission of ADA.