The Journal of the American Dental Association
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Am Dent Assoc, Vol 132, No 12, 1679-1684.
© 2001 American Dental Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by CORDES, D. W.
Right arrow Articles by LOPEZ, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by CORDES, D. W.
Right arrow Articles by LOPEZ, R.

TRENDS

JADA Continuing Education

Assessing the economic return of specializing in orthodontics or oral and maxillofacial surgery



DAVID W. CORDES, D.M.D., M.D.S., NEVILLE DOHERTY, Ph.D. and RENE LOPEZ, M.P.H.

Background. The authors determined the economic returns from an educational investment in the specialties of orthodontics and oral and maxillofacial surgery. They also addressed problems found in previous studies.

Methods. The marginal return for specializing in orthodontics or oral and maxillofacial surgery was determined using net present value and internal rate of return, or IRR, with the income of the general dentist serving as the common opportunity cost. Extreme scenario, threshold and one-way sensitivity analyses were used to account for variation in the data.

Results. The median group of orthodontists broke even 5.9 years after specialty training and had a working lifetime net return of $271,536 above that of general dentists; the IRR for them was 10.36 percent. The median group of oral and maxillofacial surgeons broke even 2.3 years after training and had a working lifetime net return of $587,563 above that of general dentists; the IRR for them was 25.30 percent.

Conclusions. Under the most likely conditions, the authors found a positive economic return to dentists in both specialties from their additional dental training.

Practice Implications. The positive financial returns brought by specialization indicate that the demand for additional dental education should continue within an environment of increased educational investment costs.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of the American Dental AssociationHome page
K. D. NASH and D. L. PFEIFER
Private practice and the economic rate of return for residency training as a prosthodontist
J Am Dent Assoc, August 1, 2005; 136(8): 1154 - 1162.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright©1995-2001 American Dental Association (ADA).
Reproduction or republication strictly prohibited without prior written permission of ADA.