The Journal of the American Dental Association
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Am Dent Assoc, Vol 132, No 3, 348-356.
© 2001 American Dental Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by DODES, J. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by DODES, J. E.
Related Collections
Right arrow Restoratives

COSMETIC & RESTORATIVE CARE

The amalgam controversy

An evidence-based analysis



JOHN E. DODES, D.D.S.

Background. There are a number of patients and health care professionals who believe dental amalgam restorations are a factor in a host of diseases and conditions. They have been influenced by anecdotal case reports in the medical and dental literature, research published in the refereed literature and media stories concerning the alleged dangers of amalgam restorations.

Methods. The author uses an evidence-based approach in analyzing the data both supporting and condemning the continued use of amalgam restorations. He reviewed the articles from both peer-reviewed and non–peer-reviewed sources and evaluated their relevance, research design and statistical analysis, as well as whether the conclusions follow from the data.

Conclusions. There are numerous logical and methodological errors in the anti-amalgam literature. The author concludes that the evidence supporting the safety of amalgam restorations is compelling.

Clinical Implications. Amalgam restorations remain safe and effective. Dentists should educate patients and other health care professionals who may be mistakenly concerned about amalgam safety.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Dent EducHome page
R. N. Haj-Ali, M. P. Walker, C. S. Petrie, K. Williams, and T. Strain
Utilization of Evidence-Based Informational Resources for Clinical Decisions Related to Posterior Composite Restorations
J Dent Educ., November 1, 2005; 69(11): 1251 - 1256.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Dent. Res.Home page
D Lobner and M Asrari
Neurotoxicity of Dental Amalgam is Mediated by Zinc
J. Dent. Res., March 1, 2003; 82(3): 243 - 246.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright©1995-2001 American Dental Association (ADA).
Reproduction or republication strictly prohibited without prior written permission of ADA.