The Journal of the American Dental Association
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Am Dent Assoc, Vol 132, No 5, 615-619.
© 2001 American Dental Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by KNIGHT, J. S.
Right arrow Articles by McROBERTS, J. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by KNIGHT, J. S.
Right arrow Articles by McROBERTS, J. G.
Related Collections
Right arrow Esthestics

RESEARCH

JADA Continuing Education

The effect of a dental unit waterline treatment regimen on the shear bond strength of resin-based composite



JAMES S. KNIGHT, D.D.S., STEPHEN B. DAVIS, D.D.S. and JOHN G. McROBERTS, D.M.D.

Background. Numerous methods of disinfecting dental waterlines have been suggested. This study evaluates the effects of one disinfecting technique on the strength of resin-based composite’s bond to enamel and to dentin.

Methods. The authors bonded resin-based composite cylinders to enamel and dentin surfaces similarly mounted and prepared using three irrigation solutions. After undergoing acid etching, the tooth surface was rinsed with either distilled water, water from a municipal water source or a mixture of distilled water and mouthwash concentrate. The authors shear-tested the samples and analyzed the data statistically.

Results. The group rinsed with distilled water mixed with mouthwash exhibited the lowest shear bond strengths. However, a one-way ANOVA indicated no statistically significant differences in the mean values among the treatment groups for either enamel (P = .295) or dentin (P = .393). Specimens bonded to enamel demonstrated primarily adhesive fracture at the tooth/composite interface. Those bonded to dentin showed a similar pattern, with some sites of cohesive fracture in the resin-based composite.

Conclusions. There was no significant difference in shear bond strengths of resin-based composite to tooth structure when rinsed with distilled water mixed with mouthwash, distilled water or water from a municipal source.

Clinical Implications. Dental unit waterlines disinfected using a diluted mouthwash solution may be used while bonding resin-based composite to either enamel or dentin.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of the American Dental AssociationHome page
A. V. Ritter, E. Ghaname, and R. H. Leonard
The influence of dental unit waterline cleaners on composite-to-dentin bond strengths
J Am Dent Assoc, July 1, 2007; 138(7): 985 - 991.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of the American Dental AssociationHome page
J. A. VON FRAUNHOFER and S. C. SIEGEL
Using chemomechanically assisted diamond bur cutting for improved efficiency
J Am Dent Assoc, January 1, 2003; 134(1): 53 - 58.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright©1995-2001 American Dental Association (ADA).
Reproduction or republication strictly prohibited without prior written permission of ADA.