|
|
||||||||
|
J Am Dent Assoc, Vol 132, No 6, 762-769.
© 2001 American Dental Association | ![]() |
CLINICAL PRACTICE |
A 12-month report
Background. The efficacy of treating questionable incipient lesions early with air abrasion, a modality used by many practitioners, has not been adequately demonstrated.
Methods. The authors enrolled 223 teeth, each with a questionable incipient pit-and-fissure carious lesion, from 93 dental patients in a projected five-year randomized clinical trial. Caries was defined as softness, decalcification or cavitation at the base of a pit or fissure or radiographic evidence of caries. Each tooth was randomly assigned to either a treatment group (n = 113 teeth) or a control group (n = 110 teeth) (which was observed but left untreated until the definition of caries was met). Each tooth in the treatment group was air-abraded and restored with a flowable resin-based composite. The authors re-examined teeth in both groups every six months; they evaluated the restorations using a modified set of Ryge criteria and inspected teeth for caries using radiographs, mirrors and standardized explorers.
Results. Of the 113 teeth with questionable incipient carious lesions air-abraded in the treatment group, 50 had caries extending into dentin. After 12 months of clinical service, there were three sealants that exhibited a partial loss of sealant which did not require any re-treatment. Two restorations with penetrating staining were re-treated. In the control group at the end of 12 months, only nine of the 86 recalled teeth were diagnosed with pit-and-fissure caries and were treated with air abrasion and restored with flowable resin-based composite. There was no statistically significant difference between the volume of the treatment and control preparations.
Conclusion. After 12 months of clinical service, two preventive resin-based composite restorations in the treatment group required re-treatment. Fewer teeth than expected in the control group were diagnosed as having caries and were treated.
Clinical Implications. The merit of treating questionable incipient pit-and-fissure carious lesions early with air abrasion has not been demonstrated after 12 months in this clinical study.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. C. Hamilton and G. Stookey Should a dental explorer be used to probe suspected carious lesions? J Am Dent Assoc, November 1, 2005; 136(11): 1526 - 1532. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. HUDSON Conservative treatment of the Class I lesion: A new paradigm for dentistry J Am Dent Assoc, June 1, 2004; 135(6): 760 - 764. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. A. MURDOCH-KINCH and M. E. McLEAN Minimally invasive dentistry J Am Dent Assoc, January 1, 2003; 134(1): 87 - 95. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. C. HAMILTON, J. B. DENNISON, K. W. STOFFERS, W. A. GREGORY, and K. B. WELCH Early treatment of incipient carious lesions: A two-year clinical evaluation J Am Dent Assoc, December 1, 2002; 133(12): 1643 - 1651. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |