The Journal of the American Dental Association
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Am Dent Assoc, Vol 133, No 10, 1399-1404.
© 2002 American Dental Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by BEAZOGLOU, T.
Right arrow Articles by BAILIT, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by BEAZOGLOU, T.
Right arrow Articles by BAILIT, H.

TRENDS

The importance of productivity in estimating need for dentists



TRYFON BEAZOGLOU, Ph.D., DENNIS HEFFLEY, Ph.D., L. JACKSON BROWN, D.D.S., Ph.D. and HOWARD BAILIT, D.M.D., Ph.D.

Background. Although the number of dentists is an important determinant of supply, other factors also contribute. Technological advancements and well-trained and managed auxiliary personnel affect supply by allowing dentists to produce more dental services per unit of time.

Methods. This article examines trends in dental output, productivity, number of dentists and dental care utilization from 1960 through 1998. The authors estimated growth rates for the entire period and selected subperiods using regression analysis. Growth rates for dentist productivity and per capita utilization are important to estimate the number of active dentists needed in the year 2020.

Results. Based on ADA practice survey data, the annual growth rate in dentists’ productivity was 1.41 percent from 1960 through 1998. However, productivity grew at different rates during this period. It increased 3.95 percent per year from 1960 to 1974. There was a decline in productivity of 0.13 percent annually from 1974 to 1991. From 1991 to 1998, productivity grew 1.05 percent annually.

Conclusions. Accurate estimates of changes in dentist productivity are important in evaluating the adequacy of the number of dentists to meet the demand for dental services.

Practice Implications. Since productivity generally increases over time, failure to account for changes in productivity can lead to an overestimation of the number of dentists required for any given level of demand for dental services.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright©1995-2002 American Dental Association (ADA).
Reproduction or republication strictly prohibited without prior written permission of ADA.