The Journal of the American Dental Association
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

J Am Dent Assoc, Vol 133, No 11, 1499-1506.
© 2002 American Dental Association
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by KASSAB, M. M.
Right arrow Articles by COHEN, R. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by KASSAB, M. M.
Right arrow Articles by COHEN, R. E.
Related Collections
Right arrow Endodontics

CLINICAL PRACTICE

JADA Continuing Education

Treatment of gingival recession



MOAWIA M. KASSAB, D.D.S., M.S. and ROBERT E. COHEN, D.D.S., Ph.D.
Background. Gingival recession is an intriguing and complex phenomenon. Patients frequently are disturbed by recession owing to sensitivity and esthetics. Many techniques have been introduced to treat gingival recession, including connective tissue grafting, or CTG; various flap designs; orthodontics; and guided tissue regeneration, or GTR. The authors reviewed human clinical studies to assess which techniques provided optimal results.

Types of Studies Reviewed. The authors reviewed controlled clinical trials to assess the outcome of gingival grafting. They also included histological studies in this article to elucidate the type of healing after those procedures were performed.

Results. The studies showed that the combination of CTG and coronally positioned flaps yielded a higher percentage of root coverage compared with other techniques. When GTR using bioabsorbable or nonbioabsorbable membranes was compared with CTG, the studies were inconclusive. Some studies found that GTR was as effective as CTG, while the others found that CTG was superior.

Clinical Implications. Gingival grafting to treat recession is a predictable and reliable periodontal procedure.






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright©1995-2002 American Dental Association (ADA).
Reproduction or republication strictly prohibited without prior written permission of ADA.