The Journal of the American Dental Association
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Am Dent Assoc, Vol 133, No 11, 1551-1559.
© 2002 American Dental Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by MANSKI, R. J.
Right arrow Articles by MOELLER, J. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by MANSKI, R. J.
Right arrow Articles by MOELLER, J. F.

TRENDS

Private dental coverage

Who has it and how does it influence dental visits and expenditures?



RICHARD J. MANSKI, D.D.S., M.B.A., Ph.D., MARK D. MACEK, D.D.S., Dr.P.H. and JOHN F. MOELLER, Ph.D.

Background. Dental insurance has had a significant impact on dentistry and dental care use. Dental insurance coverage may influence people’s decisions to use dental care. During 1996, 42.9 percent of all dental expenditures were paid by private dental insurance.

Methods. The focus of this analysis is on private dental coverage, use and expenditures for the U.S. civilian community-based population during 1996. The authors provide national estimates for the population with private dental coverage, the population with a dental visit, mean number of dental visits per year and mean total expenditures for several socioeconomic and demographic categories during 1996, using Medical Expenditure Panel Survey, or MEPS, data.

Results. Poor and low-income people were less likely to have private dental coverage than were people with higher incomes. People without coverage at all income levels were less likely to report a dental visit than were people with coverage. When they controlled for coverage, the authors found that education at any income level did not appear to affect the likelihood of people’s having multiple visits or higher expenditures.

Conclusion. People with private coverage are more likely to visit a dentist, have a greater number of visits and have higher expenditures than are those without coverage. Private dental insurance coverage, however, is not the only determinant of dental care use. MEPS data also show that other factors play key roles. Comprehensive strategies designed to improve dental care use should keep each of these determinants in mind.

Practice Implications. While dentists may have a limited ability to influence people to seek care initially, they may be in a better position to influence the amount of care patients obtain, thereby helping make sure that patients receive the care that they need and want.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Public HealthHome page
E. C. Digenis-Bury, D. R. Brooks, L. Chen, M. Ostrem, and C. R. Horsburgh
Use of a Population-Based Survey to Describe the Health of Boston Public Housing Residents
Am J Public Health, January 1, 2008; 98(1): 85 - 91.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of the American Dental AssociationHome page
W. Sohn, A. Ismail, A. Amaya, and J. Lepkowski
Determinants of dental care visits among low-income African-American children
J Am Dent Assoc, March 1, 2007; 138(3): 309 - 318.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
J. Liu, J. C. Probst, A. B. Martin, J.-Y. Wang, and C. F. Salinas
Disparities in Dental Insurance Coverage and Dental Care Among US Children: The National Survey of Children's Health
Pediatrics, February 1, 2007; 119(Supplement_1): S12 - S21.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of the American Dental AssociationHome page
T. T. Brown, T. L. Finlayson, and R. M. Scheffler
How do we measure shortages of dental hygienists and dental assistants?: Evidence from California: 1997-2005
J Am Dent Assoc, January 1, 2007; 138(1): 94 - 100.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Dent EducHome page
E. Solomon, J. Murray, W. W. Dodge, S. W. Redding, J. A. Valenza, C. M. Flaitz, J. S. Cole, and K. L. Kalkwarf
Scope of practice comparison: a tool for curriculum decision making.
J Dent Educ., March 1, 2006; 70(3): 231 - 245.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of the American Dental AssociationHome page
R. I. GARCIA
Addressing oral health disparities in diverse populations
J Am Dent Assoc, September 1, 2005; 136(9): 1210 - 1212.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
A. Davidoff, G. Kenney, and L. Dubay
Effects of the State Children's Health Insurance Program Expansions on Children With Chronic Health Conditions
Pediatrics, July 1, 2005; 116(1): e34 - e42.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of the American Dental AssociationHome page
M. D. MACEK, M. L. WAGNER, H. S. GOODMAN, M. C. MANZ, and I. D. MARRAZZO
Dental visits and access to dental care among Maryland schoolchildren
J Am Dent Assoc, April 1, 2005; 136(4): 524 - 533.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright©1995-2002 American Dental Association (ADA).
Reproduction or republication strictly prohibited without prior written permission of ADA.