HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by MANSKI, R. J. Articles by MOELLER, J. F. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by MANSKI, R. J. Articles by MOELLER, J. F.

Who has it and how does it influence dental visits and expenditures?

Background. Dental insurance has had a significant impact on dentistry and dental care use. Dental insurance coverage may influence people’s decisions to use dental care. During 1996, 42.9 percent of all dental expenditures were paid by private dental insurance.

Methods. The focus of this analysis is on private dental coverage, use and expenditures for the U.S. civilian community-based population during 1996. The authors provide national estimates for the population with private dental coverage, the population with a dental visit, mean number of dental visits per year and mean total expenditures for several socioeconomic and demographic categories during 1996, using Medical Expenditure Panel Survey, or MEPS, data.

Results. Poor and low-income people were less likely to have private dental coverage than were people with higher incomes. People without coverage at all income levels were less likely to report a dental visit than were people with coverage. When they controlled for coverage, the authors found that education at any income level did not appear to affect the likelihood of people’s having multiple visits or higher expenditures.

Conclusion. People with private coverage are more likely to visit a dentist, have a greater number of visits and have higher expenditures than are those without coverage. Private dental insurance coverage, however, is not the only determinant of dental care use. MEPS data also show that other factors play key roles. Comprehensive strategies designed to improve dental care use should keep each of these determinants in mind.

Practice Implications. While dentists may have a limited ability to influence people to seek care initially, they may be in a better position to influence the amount of care patients obtain, thereby helping make sure that patients receive the care that they need and want.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				E. C. Digenis-Bury, D. R. Brooks, L. Chen, M. Ostrem, and C. R. Horsburgh Use of a Population-Based Survey to Describe the Health of Boston Public Housing Residents Am J Public Health, January 1, 2008; 98(1): 85 - 91. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Liu, J. C. Probst, A. B. Martin, J.-Y. Wang, and C. F. Salinas Disparities in Dental Insurance Coverage and Dental Care Among US Children: The National Survey of Children's Health Pediatrics, February 1, 2007; 119(Supplement_1): S12 - S21. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. Solomon, J. Murray, W. W. Dodge, S. W. Redding, J. A. Valenza, C. M. Flaitz, J. S. Cole, and K. L. Kalkwarf Scope of practice comparison: a tool for curriculum decision making. J Dent Educ., March 1, 2006; 70(3): 231 - 245. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Davidoff, G. Kenney, and L. Dubay Effects of the State Children's Health Insurance Program Expansions on Children With Chronic Health Conditions Pediatrics, July 1, 2005; 116(1): e34 - e42. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]