The Journal of the American Dental Association
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Am Dent Assoc, Vol 133, No 2, 204-212.
© 2002 American Dental Association

Dentrix
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by SCHLEYER, T.
Right arrow Articles by SPALLEK, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by SCHLEYER, T.
Right arrow Articles by SPALLEK, H.
Related Collections
Right arrow Practice Management

INFORMATICS & TECHNOLOGY

An evaluation of five dental Internet portals



TITUS SCHLEYER, D.M.D., Ph.D. and HEIKO SPALLEK, D.M.D., Ph.D.

Background. Dental Internet portals can offer dental practitioners "one-stop shopping" for many information needs. To date, no studies have described and evaluated dental portals’ services and content.

Methods. The authors evaluated five dental portals from Jan. 22, 2001, to April 5, 2001, using 90 evaluation criteria in seven categories: general, services, miscellaneous, navigation and usability, site currency, site performance and responsiveness, and site integrity. Groups of three to four dental students rated each portal. The authors rated certain criteria using commercial monitoring and analysis services.

Results. The portals evaluated in this study provided a wide range of services such as product purchasing, online continuing education, practice management services, news, dental practice Web pages and event calendars. Portals differed in many characteristics, such as the number of services, product pricing, discussion forum activity, navigability, reaction time in response to questions and site responsiveness.

Conclusions. The implementation and usefulness of each portal’s services varied. No portal can fit all needs best, and many portals change rapidly owing to the volatility of the Internet industry. Dentists should be familiar with portals’ services and alternatives for using them.

Practice Implications. Portals can provide useful services to dental practitioners. Practitioners, however, should evaluate portals carefully to ensure that their needs are met optimally.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of the American Dental AssociationHome page
P. FEUERSTEIN
Can technology help dentists deliver better patient care?
J Am Dent Assoc, October 1, 2004; 135(suppl_1): 11S - 16S.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of the American Dental AssociationHome page
H. SPALLEK
A resource guide for practice development through technology
J Am Dent Assoc, October 1, 2004; 135(suppl_1): 38S - 44S.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright©1995-2002 American Dental Association (ADA).
Reproduction or republication strictly prohibited without prior written permission of ADA.