The Journal of the American Dental Association
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Am Dent Assoc, Vol 133, No 7, 837-841.
© 2002 American Dental Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by HUBAR, J. S.
Right arrow Articles by GARDINER, D. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by HUBAR, J. S.
Right arrow Articles by GARDINER, D. M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Dental Equipment/Instruments

CLINICAL PRACTICE

JADA Continuing Education

Evaluation of compressed air used in the dental operatory



J. SEAN HUBAR, D.M.D., M.S., WILLIAM PELON, Ph.D. and DIANA M. GARDINER, Ph.D.

Background. The authors report the findings obtained when they quantitatively examined compressed air samples from air-water syringes located in different dental operatories at the Louisiana State University School of Dentistry for the presence of microbial contaminants.

Methods. Streams of air of 30 seconds’ duration from air-water syringes were forced through sterile modified stainless steel membrane filter holders (Millipore, Millipore Corp., Bedford, Mass.), each containing a membrane filter (average pore diameter = 0.45 micrometers). Each filter was aseptically removed, placed onto the surface of a Petri dish containing sheep blood agar and incubated under increased carbon dioxide tension at 37 C for 48 hours. The authors performed a count of the resultant microbial colonies, after which they microscopically examined the gram-stained organisms.

Results. Bacteria were detected in 24 percent of the samples. The number of colonies observed on the filters varied among the dental units. The air from only one of the dental units sampled repeatedly was found to be free of bacterial contaminants. This contrasted with other units for which one or more samples were found to be positive for microorganisms. The majority of colonies observed were pigmented. Microscopic examination of organisms from representative colonies revealed that most were either gram-positive cocci or gram-negative diplococci and tetrads. The results of the one-sample t test were found to be significant (t = 5.6, df = 98, P = .0001). The 95 percent confidence interval was 0.15 to 0.32.

Conclusion. The results suggest that, at least statistically, a percentage of air lines will have bacteria present.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright©1995-2002 American Dental Association (ADA).
Reproduction or republication strictly prohibited without prior written permission of ADA.