The Journal of the American Dental Association
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Am Dent Assoc, Vol 134, No 11, 1455-1458.
© 2003 American Dental Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by DOUNDOULAKIS, J. H.
Right arrow Articles by JEFFCOAT, M. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by DOUNDOULAKIS, J. H.
Right arrow Articles by JEFFCOAT, M. K.
Related Collections
Right arrow Esthestics

COSMETIC & RESTORATIVE CARE

COVER STORY
JADA Continuing Education

The implant-supported overdenture as an alternative to the complete mandibular denture



JAMES H. DOUNDOULAKIS, D.M.D., M.S., STEVEN E. ECKERT, D.D.S., CLARENCE C. LINDQUIST, D.D.S. and MARJORIE K. JEFFCOAT, D.M.D.

Background. Approximately one-third of Americans older than 65 years of age are fully edentulous, requiring replacement of missing teeth. While the conventional denture may meet the needs of many patients, others require more retention, stability, function and esthetics, especially in the mandible. The implant-supported prosthesis is an alternative to the conventional removable denture.

Methods. This article describes the strengths of the implant-supported mandibular overdenture. The authors also outline the risks of this approach. They performed a review of recent literature to summarize the reported success rate of implants used to support a mandibular overdenture.

Results. The literature review indicates that implants placed in the anterior mandible (anterior to the foramen) have a success rate better than 95 percent. Patients have reported a high degree of satisfaction with the implant-supported overdenture.

Conclusions. The literature indicates that implant-supported overdentures in the mandible provide predictable results with improved stability, retention, function and patient satisfaction compared with conventional dentures. Implants placed in the anterior mandible have a success rate equal to or greater than 95 percent.

Clinical Implications. When planning treatment for patients with edentulous mandibles, clinicians should consider the implant-supported prosthesis.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JDRHome page
G.T. Stoker, D. Wismeijer, and M.A.J. van Waas
An Eight-year Follow-up to a Randomized Clinical Trial of Aftercare and Cost-analysis with Three Types of Mandibular Implant-retained Overdentures
Journal of Dental Research, March 1, 2007; 86(3): 276 - 280.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright©1995-2003 American Dental Association (ADA).
Reproduction or republication strictly prohibited without prior written permission of ADA.