The Journal of the American Dental Association
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Am Dent Assoc, Vol 134, No 2, 228-234.
© 2003 American Dental Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by BLANTON, P. L.
Right arrow Articles by JESKE, A. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by BLANTON, P. L.
Right arrow Articles by JESKE, A. H.
Related Collections
Right arrow Pharmacology

PRACTICAL SCIENCE

Dental local anesthetics

Alternative delivery methods



PATRICIA L. BLANTON, D.D.S., Ph.D. and ARTHUR H. JESKE, D.M.D., Ph.D.

Background. The authors review four techniques for producing block and topical anesthesia that have been advocated as alternatives to conventional methods. The objective of this review is to examine the basis for each method’s application in dentistry, including scientific studies where available.

Types of Studies Reviewed. The authors reviewed both historical (1912 and 1923) and more recent (1977 to present) reports relating to specific local anesthetic delivery systems. While this article is not a comprehensive literature review, the clinical reports and double-blind scientific reports from peer-reviewed publications are specific to the various attributes of the delivery systems being described. In addition, the authors identify any claims lacking scientific validity.

Results. Several alternative local anesthetic delivery systems are clinically effective in producing local anesthesia. Potential adverse effects and complications do, however, differ from one technology to another, depending on the mechanical characteristics of the particular system. Finally, all of the alternative local anesthetic delivery systems represent additional costs when compared with those of conventional applications, and cost-effectiveness is an important factor to be considered when implementing these systems in a dental practice.

Clinical Implications. Alternative local anesthetic delivery systems may offer some advantages over conventional techniques in certain situations, although the costs may outweigh the advantages in certain cases.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright©1995-2003 American Dental Association (ADA).
Reproduction or republication strictly prohibited without prior written permission of ADA.