HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by BAUROTH, K. Articles by KUMAR, L.D. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by BAUROTH, K. Articles by KUMAR, L.D.

A comparative study

Background. The use of dental floss has long been considered to be effective in controlling interproximal plaque and gingivitis. The authors compared this method with that of use of a mouthrinse.

Methods. Subjects with mild-to-moderate gingivitis enrolled in a long-term, six-month study. They received a dental prophylaxis and were randomized into one of the three following treatment groups: brushing and rinsing with an essential oil-containing mouthrinse (the BEO group), brushing and flossing (the BF group) and brushing and rinsing with a control rinse (the B group).

Results. A total of 326 subjects were evaluated. The BEO and BF had significantly lower (P < .001) mean interproximal Modified Gingival Index, or MGI, scores than did the B group at six months. The BEO group had lower mean interproximal Plaque Index, or PI, scores than the other two groups at both three and six months. The BF group’s mean PI score was significantly lower than the B group’s mean score at six months only. The magnitude of reductions for the BEO and the BF groups (vs. the B group) in MGI were 11.1 percent and 4.3 percent and for PI were 20.0 percent and 3.4 percent, respectively.

Conclusions. In conjunction with professional care (prophylaxis) and toothbrushing over six months, rinsing twice daily with an essential oil–containing mouthrinse was at least as good as flossing daily in reducing interproximal plaque and gingivitis.

Clinical Implications. When weighing recommendations for oral hygiene home care, clinicians should consider that an essential oil–containing mouthrinse may be a useful adjunct in patients with gingival inflammation.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				F.F. Sniehotta, V. Araujo Soares, and S.U. Dombrowski Randomized Controlled Trial of a One-minute Intervention Changing Oral Self-care Behavior Journal of Dental Research, July 1, 2007; 86(7): 641 - 645. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. C. Gunsolley A meta-analysis of six-month studies of antiplaque and antigingivitis agents J Am Dent Assoc, December 1, 2006; 137(12): 1649 - 1657. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. H. Southerland, G. W. Taylor, and S. Offenbacher Diabetes and Periodontal Infection: Making the Connection Clin. Diabetes, October 1, 2005; 23(4): 171 - 178. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. SHARMA, C.H. CHARLES, M.C. LYNCH, J. QAQISH, J.A. MCGUIRE, J.G. GALUSTIANS, and L.D. KUMAR Adjunctive benefit of an essential oil-containing mouthrinse in reducing plaque and gingivitis in patients who brush and floss regularly: A six-month study J Am Dent Assoc, April 1, 2004; 135(4): 496 - 504. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]