The Journal of the American Dental Association
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Am Dent Assoc, Vol 134, No 5, 613-618.
© 2003 American Dental Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by NAVAZESH, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by NAVAZESH, M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Practice Management

PRACTICAL SCIENCE

JADA Continuing Education

How can oral health care providers determine if patients have dry mouth?



MAHVASH NAVAZESH, D.M.D.

Background. Dentists recognize the importance of saliva in maintaining oral health and often are familiar with the clinical effects an insufficient salivary flow can have on oral tissues. A variety of medical conditions and medications can alter salivary secretion and composition. Typically, diagnosis of hyposalivation is made only after damage has occurred to the oral tissues.

Overview. The author describes a series of clinical steps that, if followed properly, may help in the early detection of salivary gland hypofunction and prevention of its severe complications. This four-step approach includes identifying a patient’s chief complaint and the symptoms and duration of illness that brought the patient to the dentist, as well as any approaches the patient took to relieve symptoms; obtaining a medical history that includes a review of the body systems; performing a clinical evaluation that notes the patient’s overall condition in addition to the health and functioning of the salivary glands and oral soft and hard tissues; and, when needed, conducting further diagnostic evaluations.

Conclusions and Clinical Implications. Oral health care providers will continue to face the challenges of treating new and recurrent carious lesions if the profession’s approach to salivary hypofunction remains reactive rather than proactive. The recommendations in this article may enhance clinicians’ awareness of the objective methods used to identify patients with salivary gland hypofunction or those at risk of developing it. It is hoped that early identification of asymptomatic patients at risk of developing hyposalivation, as well as symptomatic patients will lower the incidence and prevalence of dental caries and fungal infections in this population and ultimately enhance their quality of life.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright©1995-2003 American Dental Association (ADA).
Reproduction or republication strictly prohibited without prior written permission of ADA.