The Journal of the American Dental Association
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Am Dent Assoc, Vol 134, No 6, 715-720.
© 2003 American Dental Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by LEARY, J. C.
Right arrow Articles by HIRAYAMA, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by LEARY, J. C.
Right arrow Articles by HIRAYAMA, M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Implants

CLINICAL PRACTICE

Extraction, immediate-load implants, impressions and final restorations in two patient visits



JOSEPH C. LEARY, D.M.D. and MUNEKI HIRAYAMA, D.M.D.

Background. Since the advent of immediately loaded implants, patients have experienced shorter treatment times, reduced amount of surgical therapy, preserved gingival esthetics and the comfort and security of fixed prostheses. Practitioners have experienced less expense in the form of chair time and greater patient satisfaction.

Case Description. The authors present two cases in which, at the first clinical visit, they extracted maxillary incisors, placed hydroxyapatite-coated implants, took impressions for final restorations and stabilized the implants immediately with a fixed interim prosthesis. At the second clinical visit, the authors placed the final restorations. All of the implants were integrated clinically, and gingival esthetics appeared to have benefited from preservation of papillary form, which was made possible with fixed interim anterior restorations. The patients expressed satisfaction with the results particularly because the treatment was accomplished in two clinical visits.

Clinical Implications. The cases presented demonstrate a technique that may be of value to therapists who place immediate-load implants. The long-term effectiveness of immediate-load implants requires further evidence to ensure their long-term usefulness and safety.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright©1995-2003 American Dental Association (ADA).
Reproduction or republication strictly prohibited without prior written permission of ADA.