HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

J Am Dent Assoc, Vol 134, No 7, 845-850. © 2003 American Dental Association

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by LITONJUA, L. A. Articles by COHEN, R. E. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by LITONJUA, L. A. Articles by COHEN, R. E. Related Collections Periodontics

A re-evaluation

Background. The concept of abfraction is controversial. The authors present the fundamental basis of abfraction and review studies that describe the condition.

Types of Studies Reviewed. The authors used data on masticatory forces, enamel and dentin properties, as well as stress studies related to abfraction, for background information. They also analyzed the genesis of the abfraction theory, experimental evidence, case presentations, clinical investigations and restorative studies.

Results. The theory of abfraction is based primarily on engineering analyses that demonstrate theoretical stress concentration at the cervical areas of teeth. While some recent stress studies support earlier findings, others have provided significant deviating information. Few controlled studies exist that demonstrate the relationship between occlusal loading and abfraction lesions. The role of occlusal loading in noncarious cervical lesions (as shown by clinical data) appears to be part of a multifactorial event that may not necessarily follow the proposed classic abfraction mechanism, and other mechanisms or factors may explain cervical restoration failure just as well.

Clinical Implications. There is little direct evidence supporting the theory of abfraction as the primary factor in the formation of noncarious cervical lesions. Controlled clinical trials are necessary to elucidate more fully the etiology of those lesions.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				L. F. PEGORARO, J. M. SCOLARO, P. C. CONTI, D. TELLES, and T. A. PEGORARO Noncarious cervical lesions in adults: Prevalence and occlusal aspects J Am Dent Assoc, December 1, 2005; 136(12): 1694 - 1700. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. ONAL and T. PAMIR The two-year clinical performance of esthetic restorative materials in noncarious cervical lesions J Am Dent Assoc, November 1, 2005; 136(11): 1547 - 1555. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Staninec, R.K. Nalla, J.F. Hilton, R.O. Ritchie, L.G. Watanabe, G. Nonomura, G.W. Marshall, and S.J. Marshall Dentin Erosion Simulation by Cantilever Beam Fatigue and pH Change Journal of Dental Research, April 1, 2005; 84(4): 371 - 375. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. C. AW, X. LEPE, G. H. JOHNSON, and L. A. MANCL A three-year clinical evaluation of two-bottle versus one-bottle dentin adhesives J Am Dent Assoc, March 1, 2005; 136(3): 311 - 322. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]