HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

J Am Dent Assoc, Vol 134, No 7, 869-876. © 2003 American Dental Association

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by JACOBS, S. Articles by MAY, S. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by JACOBS, S. Articles by MAY, S. Related Collections Endodontics

JADA Continuing Education

Comparison of three mandibular block techniques and modulation by nitrous oxide:oxygen

Background. The authors conducted this study to compare the pain on injection of the three mandibular block techniques and to determine the effect that the delivery of nitrous oxide:oxygen, or N₂O:O₂, had on this pain.

Methods. Based on sample size calculation, the authors randomly assigned 60 subjects to receive either local anesthetic alone or local anesthetic with N₂O:O₂ titrated to effect. Each subject received two mandibular block injections bilaterally from three possible pairings: Gow-Gates/standard block, standard block/Vazirani-Akinosi or Gow-Gates/Vazirani-Akinosi. Subjects scored their pain using a 100-millimeter visual analog scale immediately after each injection. The authors analyzed data using analysis of variance, Student t tests and multiple regression analyses.

Results. There were no significant differences in pain on injection among the three injection techniques. The subjects in the group that received N₂O:O₂ and the local anesthetic demonstrated a statistically significant reduction in pain on injection compared with subjects in the group that received the local anesthetic only (P < .05). When N₂O:O₂ was used, there was a statistically significant decrease in pain with the first injection (P < .0005), an effect not seen with the second injection.

Conclusions. There was no significant difference in pain among the three mandibular block techniques. N₂O:O₂ can reduce pain on the first injection given, but this effect is not seen subsequently.

Clinical Implications. The decision to select one of the three mandibular block techniques should be based on factors other than pain on injection. N₂O:O₂ reduces pain on the first injection only.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				T. M. Johnson, R. Badovinac, and J. Shaefer Teaching Alternatives to the Standard Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block in Dental Education: Outcomes in Clinical Practice J Dent Educ., September 1, 2007; 71(9): 1145 - 1152. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]